4.0 Article

Genotype-by-sex interaction in the regulation of high-density lipoprotein: The Framingham Heart Study

Journal

HUMAN BIOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages 773-793

Publisher

WAYNE STATE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1353/hub.2006.0017

Keywords

high-density lipoprotein (HDL); linkage; genotype-by-sex interaction; sexual dimorphism; cardiovascular disease; Framington Heart Study

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HC-25195] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) are widely documented as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Furthermore, there is marked sexual dimorphism in both HDL levels and the prevalence of CVD. However, the extent to which genetic factors contribute to such dimorphism has been largely unexplored. We examined the evidence for genotype-by-sex effects on HDL in a longitudinal sample of 1,562 participants from 330 families in the Framingham Heart Study at three times points corresponding approximately to 1971-1974, 1980-1983, and 1988-1991. Using a variance component method, we conducted a genome scan of HDL at each time point in males and females, separately and combined, and tested for genotype-by-sex interaction at a quantitative trait locus (QTL) at each time point. Consistent findings were noted only for females on chromosome 2 near marker D2S1328, with adjusted LOD scores of 2.6, 2.2, and 2.1 across the three time points, respectively. In males suggestive linkage was detected on chromosome 16 near marker D16S3396 at the second time point and on chromosome 18 near marker D18S851 at the third time point (adjusted LOD = 2.2 and 2.4, respectively). Although the heritability of HDL is similar in males and females, sex appears to exert a substantial effect on the QTL-specific variance of HDL. When genotype-by-sex interactions exist and are not modeled, the power to detect linkage is reduced; thus our results may explain in part the paucity of significant linkage findings for HDL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available