4.7 Article

Multi-objective shape optimization of double pipe heat exchanger with inner corrugated tube using RSM method

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 173-186

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2014.12.010

Keywords

Double pipe heat exchanger; Corrugated tube; RSM; Objective function; Multi-objective optimization

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M561328]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51476042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Integrated a fully developing three-dimensional heat transfer and flow model, a multi-objective optimization aims to fulfill the geometric design for double-tube heat exchangers with inner corrugated tube is investigated in this work with RSM. Dimensionless corrugation pitch (p/D), dimensionless corrugation height (HID), dimensionless corrugation radius (r/D) and Reynolds number (Re) are considered as four design parameters. Considering the process parameters, the characteristic numbers involving heat transfer characteristic, resistance characteristic and overall heat transfer performance calculated by CFD, and are served as objective functions to the RSM (Nu(c), f(c), Nu(c)/Nu(s), f(c)/f(s) and eta in this paper). The results of optimal designs are a set of multiple optimum solutions, called 'Pareto optimal solutions'. It reveals the identical tendency of Nu(c)/Nu(s) and f(c)/f(s) reflecting the conflict between them that means augmenting the heat transfer performance with various design parameters in the optimal situation inevitably sacrificed the increase of flow resistance. According to the Pareto optimal curves, the optimum designing parameters of double pipe heat exchanger with inner corrugated tube under the constrains of Nu(c)/Nu(s) >= 1.2 are found to be P/D = 0.82, H/D = 0.22, r/D = 0.23, Re = 26,263, corresponding to the maximum value of eta = 1.12. 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available