4.7 Article

Thermal conductivity prediction of copper hollow nanowire

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 90-95

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.02.017

Keywords

Thermal conductivity; Metallic hollow nanowire

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51406224]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2014QNA22]
  3. China Post-doctoral Science Foundation [2014M551691]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because its superficial area is larger than that of a nanowire, hollow nanowires have drawn more and more attention in solar cells, lithium ion batteries, and other potential applications. The thermal property of a hollow nanowire is useful, but there is little study on the matter. This paper marks the first careful study of the metallic hollow nanowire's thermal conductivity. The electron mean free path was simulated, and a fitting model for easy calculation was established based on that simulation. With an electron mean free path already obtained, the electronic thermal conductivity can be easily determined. At the same time, a model based on the ballistic-diffusive effective medium model was established to calculate the lattice thermal conductivity of a hollow nanowire. In the study of copper hollow nanowires, it turns out that: model results of the lattice thermal conductivity agree with results obtained by molecular dynamics. The size effect of the electronic or lattice thermal conductivity of a hollow nanowire is characterized well by the equivalent diameter. With a similar diameter, the electronic or lattice thermal conductivity of a hollow nanowire approximately equals with that of a nanowire. From the point of thermal conductivity, the hollow nanowire will be a good substitute for the nanowire. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available