Journal
JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 1009-1040Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/logcom/exi046
Keywords
argumentation; persuasion; dialogue games; defeasible reasoning
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article carries out a formal study of dialogue games for argumentation. A formal framework for such games is proposed which imposes an explicit reply structure on dialogues, where each dialogue move either attacks or surrenders to some earlier move of the other participant. The framework is flexible in several respects. It allows for different underlying logics, alternative sets of locutions and more or less strict rules for when they are allowed. In particular, it allows for varying degrees of coherence and flexibility when it comes to maintaining the focus of a dialogue. Its formal nature supports the study of formal properties of specific dialogue protocols, especially on how they respect the underlying logic.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available