4.4 Article

Proton MRS imaging in the follow-up of patients with suspected low-grade gliomas

Journal

NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages 887-891

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-005-1435-z

Keywords

astrocytoma; clinical; low-grade glioma; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compared the value of changes in proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (H-1-MRSI) with changes in clinical status and/or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the monitoring of patients with suspected low-grade glioma (LGG). From June 1, 1999 till May 31, 2002, we included consecutive, neurologically intact adult patients suspected of having an LGG, demonstrating non-enhancing supratentorial lesions without edema or mass effect on MRI, and in whom all treatment ( including a diagnostic biopsy) was deferred. Till January 1, 2003, patients were surveyed clinically and radiologically (contrast-enhanced MRI and H-1-MRSI). Patients who showed progression on clinical examination and/or MRI were denoted as progressive disease. Other patients were denoted as stable disease. A decrease in NAA/CHO ratio of >= 20% compared to the baseline value was considered as indicative for progression on H-1-MRSI. We included 14 patients with suspected LGG. Seven patients demonstrated progressive disease during the follow-up period, preceded or accompanied by concomitant H-1-MRSI changes in five patients. Four of these five patients were operated on within the follow-up interval. The histological diagnosis demonstrated high-grade glioma in three and LGG in one patient. In the other two patients with progressive disease, no progression was found on H-1-MRSI. The other seven patients demonstrated stable disease, but four of them showed progression on H-1-MRSI. Our data do not show convincing evidence that H-1-MRSI contributes to adequate monitoring and follow-up of patients with suspected LGG. Future research should preferably include pathological data at the time of H-1-MRSI changes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available