4.2 Article

Habitat preferences of ungulates in hunted and nonhunted areas in the Calakmul Forest, Campeche, Mexico

Journal

BIOTROPICA
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 676-685

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00086.x

Keywords

brocket deer; Calakmul; collared peccary; habitat use; hunting; Mexico; tapir; transects; ungulates; white-lipped peccary; white-tailed deer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated habitat preference in the community of ungulates in the Calaktmul Forest of Southern Mexico through systematically counting the tracks of six species in randomly placed transects. Tracks were associated with one of Four major forest types according to Pennington and Sarukhan (1998). Forest type availability was estimated through 393 independent points on the same transects. We surveyed 90 transects in three limited areas and one large nonhunted area, with a total of 206 kill walked. A total of 1672 tracks of the six species were Found. Brocket deer (Mazama americana and Mazama pandora) preferred low-dry forest in the nonhunted area and low-flooded forest in the hunted areas. Collared peccary (Pecari tajacu) was a generalist species in the nonhunted area, whereas in the hunted areas, it preferred the subperennial forest. White-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari) was Found only in subperennial forest in the nonhunted area and favored low-flooded forest in tire hunted,areas. White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) preferred low-flooded forest in the hunted areas, while it was a generalist in the nonhunted area. Tapir (Tapirus bairdii) preferred low-flooded forest in the hunted areas. The most evident habitat difference among hunted and nonhunted areas was a major use of low-flooded forest in the hunted areas for the species. Conservation of ungulate species in the Calakmul region requires protection of all major habitat types in burned and nonhunted areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available