4.5 Review

Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review

Journal

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST
Volume 60, Issue 9, Pages 950-958

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950

Keywords

sex differences; mathematics; science; cognitive development; spatial reasoning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article considers 3 claims that cognitive sex differences account for the differential representation of men and women in high-level careers in mathematics and science: (a) males are more focused on objects from the beginning of life and therefore are predisposed to better learning about mechanical systems; (b) males have a profile of spatial and numerical abilities producing greater aptitude for mathematics; and (c) males are more variable in their cognitive abilities and therefore predominate at the upper reaches of mathematical talent. Research on cognitive development in human infants, preschool children, and students at all levels fails to support these claims. Instead, it provides evidence that mathematical and scientific reasoning develop front a set of biologically based cognitive capacities that males and females share. These capacities lead men and women to develop equal talent for mathematics and science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available