4.6 Article

Risk of Valve-Related Events After Aortic Valve Repair

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages 606-613

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.07.016

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The impetus for aortic valve (AV) repair is to decrease valve-related complications in comparison to prosthetic valve replacement. However, relatively few data are available to confirm this hypothesis. We analyzed valve-related complications in a large series of patients undergoing AV repair. Methods. Between 1995 and 2010, 475 patients underwent elective AV repair for aortic insufficiency or aortic aneurysm. The mean age was 53 years, and 81% were male. Valve-related outcomes were defined as per published guidelines. Survival and freedom from valve-related events were reported using the Kaplan-Meier method and linearized event rates. Clinical follow-up was 98.3% complete with a mean follow-up time of 4.6 years. Results. Thirty-day mortality was 0.8% (n = 4). At 10 years, overall survival was 73% +/- 5%, freedom from cardiac death was 81% +/- 4%, and freedom from valve-related death was 90% +/- 3%. Freedom from significant aortic insufficiency was 84% +/- 3%. A total of 28 patients needed early (n = 7) or late (n = 21) AV reoperation; all of them survived reoperation, and 8 had repeat repair. Ten-year freedom from AV reoperation was 86% +/- 3%, and freedom from AV replacement was 90% +/- 3%. Freedom from AV reoperation was similar in tricuspid and bicuspid valve. During the follow-up period, linearized rate of thromboembolic event, bleeding, and AV endocarditis was 1.1%, 0.23%, and 0.19% per year, respectively. Ten-year freedom from valve-related events including AV reoperation, thromboembolic event, bleeding, and endocarditis was 74% +/- 3%. Conclusions. The current findings confirm that AV repair is associated with low mortality, acceptable durability, and a low risk of valve-related events. (Ann Thorac Surg 2013;95:606-13) (c) 2013 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available