4.6 Article

Geographic variation of golden redfish (Sebastes marinus) and deep-sea redfish (S. mentella) in the North Atlantic based on otolith shape analysis

Journal

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 62, Issue 8, Pages 1691-1698

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.05.012

Keywords

Fourier analysis; North Atlantic; otolith shape; redfish; Sebastes marinus; Sebastes mentella; stock identification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The unresolved interrelationships of North Atlantic redfish stocks have prevented adaptive fisheries assessment and management in the past. Otolith shapes of golden redfish (S. marinus) and deep-sea redfish (S. mentella) were analysed for geographic variation within the entire distribution range in the North Atlantic, in order to evaluate this technique for stock separation. Multivariate analysis of elliptical Fourier shape descriptors revealed high similarity of S. marinas within the central North Atlantic areas (West and East Greenland, Iceland) that were relatively well separated from the Flemish Cap and Barents Sea samples. A similar separation of the Barents Sea area was also observed for S. mentella, whereas the western (Flemish Cap, Davis Strait) and central areas were overlapping to a greater extent. The overall classification rate given by discrinlinant analysis was poor for both species (<50%) but increased to 72-74% by combining sampling areas to regions (west, central, east). Geographic variation in otolith shapes ofboth redfish species suggests a separation of the Northeast Arctic stocks (Barents Sea) of both species from the other redfish stocks assessed within ICES and NAFO, whereas similarities observed for the highly migratory S. mentella give reason for integrated managernent of dernersal and pelagic occurrences of this important fisheries resource that straddles the ICES/NAFO boundaries. (c) 2001 International Council for the Exploration ofthe Sea. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available