4.2 Article

Methylation status of fragile histidine triad (FHIT) gene and its clinical impact on prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 6, Pages 505-510

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2005.00560.x

Keywords

multiple myeloma; methylation; FHIT gene; prognosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aberrant methylation of tumor suppressor genes (TSG) has been studied in multiple myeloma (MM). We determined the methylation status of the FHIT (fragile histidine triad) gene, a putative TSG, in 48 patients with MM. Clinical association with its methylation status was then analyzed. The FHIT gene methylation was observed in 21 of the 48 patients (44%). No association between FHIT gene methylation and clinical variables such as age, gender and clinical stage was found. However, the estimated 50% survival time of the methylated group was significantly shorter than that of the unmethylated group (18.2 vs. 45.1 months, P < 0.05). Univariate analysis revealed adverse prognostic factors: FHIT gene methylation (P = 0.028), poor performance status (I to IV, P = 0.002), anemia (<= 8.5 g/dL, P = 0.007), hypoalbuminemia (<= 3.5 g/dL, P < 0.002), high serum C-reactive protein levels (> 0.5 mg/dL, P = 0.002), elevated beta-2-microglobulin serum levels (> 6.5 mg/L, P < 0.001), and treatments not including autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (auto-PBSCT) (P = 0.007). Multivariate analysis identified FHIT gene methylation [hazard ratio (HR) 1.722, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.150-2.603, P = 0.009], elevated beta-2-microglobulin serum levels (> 6.5 mg/L, HR 2.005, 95% CI 1.035-3.937, P = 0.004), and treatments not including auto-PBSCT are independent predictive variables. These findings indicate that aberrant methylation of the FHIT gene is an independent adverse prognostic factor in MM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available