4.6 Article

Changes in supraspinal activation patterns following robotic locomotor therapy in motor-incomplete spinal cord injury

Journal

NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 313-324

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1545968305281515

Keywords

locomotor training; functional magnetic resonance imaging; supraspinal plasticity; motor cortex; cerebellum; spinal cord injury

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R24 HD39629] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. Body weight-supported treadmill training (BWSTT) is a task-specific rehabilitation strategy that enhances functional locomotion in patients following spinal cord injury (SCI). Supraspinal centers may play an important role in the recovery of over-ground locomotor function in patients with motor-incomplete SCI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential for supraspinal reorganization associated with 12 weeks of robotic BWSTT using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Methods. Four men with motor-incomplete SCI participated in this study Dine since onset ranged from 14 weeks to 48 months post-SCI injury. All subjects were trained with BWSTT 3 times weekly for 12 weeks. This training was preceded and followed by fMRI study of supraspinal activity during a movement task. Testing of locomotor disability included the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II) and over-ground gait speed. Results. All subjects demonstrated some degree of change in the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal following BWSTT. fMRI results demonstrated greater activation in sensorimotor cortical regions (S1, S2) and cerebellar regions following BWSTT. Conclusions. Intensive task-specific rehabilitation training, such as robotic BWSTT, can promote supraspinal plasticity in the motor centers known to be involved in locomotion. Furthermore, improvement in over-ground locomotion is accompanied by an increased activation of the cerebellum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available