4.5 Article

C60 binds to and deforms nucleotides

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages 3856-3862

Publisher

BIOPHYSICAL SOCIETY
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.064410

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations are performed for up to 20 ns to monitor the formation and the stability of complexes composed of single- or double-strand DNA molecules and C-60 in aqueous solution. Despite the hydrophobic nature of C-60, our results show that fullerenes strongly bind to nucleotides. The binding energies are in the range -27 to -42 kcal/mol; by contrast, the binding energy of two fullerenes in aqueous solution is only -7.5 kcal/ mol. We observe the displacement of water molecules from the region between the nucleotides and the fullerenes and we attribute the large favorable interaction energies to hydrophobic interactions. The features of the DNA-C-60 complexes depend on the nature of the nucleotides: C-60 binds to double-strand DNA, either at the hydrophobic ends or at the minor groove of the nucleotide. C-60 binds to single-strand DNA and deforms the nucleotides significantly. Unexpectedly, when the double-strand DNA is in the A-form, fullerenes penetrate into the double helix from the end, form stable hybrids, and frustrate the hydrogen bonds between endgroup basepairs in the nucleotide. When the DNA molecule is damaged (specifically, a gap was created by removing a piece of the nucleotide from one helix), fullerenes can stably occupy the damaged site. We speculate that this strong association may negatively impact the self-repairing process of the double-strand DNA. Our results clearly indicate that the association between C-60 and DNA is stronger and more favorable than that between two C-60 molecules in water. Therefore, our simulation results suggest that C-60 molecules have potentially negative impact on the structure, stability, and biological functions of DNA molecules.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available