4.7 Article

Anti-serum amyloid component P antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus correlate with disease activity

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 64, Issue 12, Pages 1698-1702

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2005.035832

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the presence of raised titres of anti-serum amyloid P component ( SAP) antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to evaluate their correlation with clinical disease by the SLEDAI and clinical manifestations. Methods: 452 samples were screened for raised anti-SAP antibody titres by an ELISA. Clinical measures and SLEDAI scores were independently reviewed from medical records. 21 serial samples from 7 patients with SLE were assessed for a change in anti- SAP antibody titres after treatment. Results: Raised anti- SAP antibody titres were detected in 145/328 (44%) SLE samples. In 112 randomly selected samples, 69/112 (62%) patients had raised anti- SAP antibodies and anti- dsDNA antibody titres, whereas only 32/112 (28%) had raised anti- dsDNA antibody titres without raised anti- SAP antibody titres. The mean titre of anti- SAP antibodies in patients with active disease was higher than in patients with inactive disease and controls. SLEDAI scores, assessed in 54 patients, were raised in 26/31 (84%) patients with raised anti- SAP antibody titres. A SLEDAI score >= 8 was found in 16/31 (52%) patients with raised anti- SAP antibody titres but in only 5/23 (22%) patients without raised titres. No specific pattern of disease was detected in patients with or without raised titres of anti-SAP antibodies. Serial sampling from patients with active SLE and raised anti- SAP antibody titres showed that anti-SAP antibody titres decreased after treatment and correlated with clinical improvement. Conclusion: Raised anti- SAP antibody titres detected in patients with SLE correlate with disease activity and decrease with improvement of clinical disease, and thus may serve as an additional prognostic marker.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available