4.3 Article

Analysis of streamflow trends and the effects of climate in Pennsylvania, 1971 to 2001

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages 1393-1405

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03807.x

Keywords

surface water hydrology; rivers/streams; flow trends; statistical analysis; climate; Pennsylvania

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An understanding of temporal trends in total streamflow (TSF), base flow (BF), and storm runoff (110) can help in the development of water management plans for watersheds and local communities. In this study, 47 streams across Pennsylvania that were unregulated and unaffected by karst environments or coal mining were studied for flow trends and their relationships to selected climate parameters for the period 1971 to 2001. LOWESS curves for annual flow showed that almost all of the selected streams in Pennsylvania had downward trends in total TSF, BF, and RO. Using a seasonal Mann-Kendall analysis, downward trends were significant at an alpha = 0.05 level for 68, percent 70 percent, and 62 percent of the streams and at an alpha = 0.10 level for another 19, 17, and 13 percent of the streams for TSF, BF, and RO, respectively. The ratio of BF to TSF (RBS) had significant upward trends for 34 percent of the streams at an alpha = 0.05 level and for another 9 percent of the streams at an alpha = 0.10 level, indicating that TSF decreased relative to BF for more than 40 percent of the streams during the previous 30 years. Downward trends in TSF, BF, and RO were most common for the months of June, July, and December. Trend analyses using monthly and annual total precipitation and mean temperature showed some association between climate and the streamflow trends, but Spearman's correlation and partial Mann-Kendall analyses revealed that the trends in TSF, BF, and RO could not be explained by trends in precipitation and temperature alone, and thus urbanization and development may have played a role.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available