4.7 Article

Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations

Journal

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 19, Issue 24, Pages 3055-3069

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.361805

Keywords

replicative stress; checkpoint; DNA polymerases; Mec1; Sgs1; chromosome instability

Funding

  1. NCCDPHP CDC HHS [U48 DP000060] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The yeast checkpoint kinases Mec1 and Rad53 are required for genomic stability in the presence of replicative stress. When replication forks stall, the stable maintenance of replisome components requires the ATR kinase Mec1/Ddc2 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. It was unclear whether either Mec1 or Sgs1 action requires the checkpoint effector kinase, Rad53. By combining sgs1 Delta with checkpoint-deficient alleles, we can now distinguish the role of Mec1 at stalled forks from that of Rad53. We show that the S-phase-specific mec1-100 allele, like the sgs1 Delta mutation, partially destabilizes DNA polymerases at stalled forks, yet combining the mec1-100 and sgs1A mutations leads to complete disassociation of the replisome, loss of RPA, irreversible termination of nucleotide incorporation, and compromised recovery from hydroxyurea (HU) arrest. These events coincide with a dramatic increase in both spontaneous and HU-induced chromosomal rearrangements. Importantly, in sgs1 Delta cells, RPA levels at stalled forks do not change, although Ddc2 recruitment is compromised, explaining the partial Sgs1 and Mecl interdependence. Loss of Rad53 kinase, on the other hand, does not affect the levels of DNA polymerases at arrested forks, but leads to MCM protein dissociation. Finally, confirming its unique role during replicative stress, Mec1, and not Tell, is shown to modify fork-associated histone H2A.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available