4.5 Article

A randomized placebo controlled trial of ranitidine versus sucralfate in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage for prevention of gastric hemorrhage

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 239, Issue 1, Pages 5-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2005.07.011

Keywords

stroke; ICH; gastric hemorrhage; malena; hematemesis; sucralfate; ranitidine; stress ulcer; randomized control trial

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Due of paucity Of Studies on stress ulcer prophylaxis in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), we have evaluated the usefulness of ranitidine and sucralfate in preventing, gastric hemorrhage (GH) in patients with ICH. Subjects and methods: In a hospital-based randomized placebo-controlled study, patients with CT-proven ICH within 7 days of ictus were randomized into ranitidine 50 mg i.v. eight hourly, sucralfate 1 g six hourly and placebo groups. Patients were conservatively managed. Primary endpoint was occurrence of GH within 15 days of ictus and secondary endpoint 1-month mortality. Results: The mean age of the patients was 57.2 (range 25-90) years and 40 were females. There were 45 patients in ranitidine, 49 in sucralfate and 47 in placebo group. Demographic, clinical and radiological features were not significantly different in 3 groups. GH Occurred in 11 (23.4%) patients in placebo, 5 (11. 1 %) in ranitidine and 7 (14.3%) in sucralfate group, which was not significant. Only one female had GH. There were 13 (27.7%) deaths in placebo, 5 (11. 1%) in ranitidine and 12 (24.5%) in sucralfate group. Pneumonia occurred in placebo group in 5 (10.6%), ranitidine in 2 (4.4%) and sucralfate in 5 (10.2%) patients, which was not significantly different. Conclusion: Ranitidine and sucralfate do not seem to significantly prevent GH or reduce 1-month mortality. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available