4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Is VATS Lobectomy Better: Perioperatively, Biologically and Oncologically?

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages S2107-S2111

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.020

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current review focuses on a clinical comparison of lobectomy by means of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open lobectomy. The best available evidence strongly suggests that VATS lobectomy is less morbid than open lobectomy, and that VATS lobectomy is less immunosuppressive and elicits a milder inflammatory response than open lobectomy. Midterm to long-term oncologic results of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer appear to be equivalent for VATS and open lobectomy. Because a large, prospective, randomized, multiinstitutional trial of open versus VATS lobectomy will likely never take place, we are dependent on the summarized information to draw practical conclusions. (Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: S2107-11) (C) 2010 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available