4.6 Article

Pulmonary Endarterectomy Improves Dyspnea by the Relief of Dead Space Ventilation

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages 347-352

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.08.001

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. In chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), dyspnea is considered to be related to increased dead space ventilation caused by vascular obstruction. Pulmonary endarterectomy releases the thromboembolic obstruction, thereby improving regional pulmonary blood flow. We hypothesized that pulmonary endarterectomy reduces dead space ventilation and that this reduction contributes to attenuation of dyspnea symptoms. Methods. In this follow-up study we assessed dead space ventilation, hemodynamic severity of disease, and symptomatic dyspnea in 54 consecutive CTEPH patients, before and 1 year after pulmonary endarterectomy. Dead space ventilation was calculated using the Bohr-Enghoff equation. Dyspnea was assessed by Borg scores and the New York Heart Association functional classification. Results. Preoperatively, dead space ventilation was increased (0.40 +/- 0.07) and correlated with severity of disease (mean pulmonary artery pressure: r = 0.49, p < 0.001; total pulmonary resistance: r = 0.53, p < 0.001), and resting (r = 0.35, p < 0.05) and post-exercise Borg dyspnea scores (r = 0.44, p < 0.01). Postoperatively, dead space ventilation (0.33 +/- 0.08, p < 0.001) and dyspnea symptoms decreased significantly. Changes in symptomatic dyspnea were independently associated with changes in pulmonary hemodynamics and absolute dead space. Conclusions. Dead space ventilation in CTEPH is increased and correlates significantly with hemodynamic severity of disease and dyspnea symptoms. Pulmonary endarterectomy decreases dead space ventilation. The induced change in dead space upon surgical removal of chronic thromboembolism contributes to the postoperative recovery of symptomatic dyspnea. (Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:347-52) (C) 2010 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available