4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Computational analysis of microRNA targets in Caenorhabditis elegans

Journal

GENE
Volume 365, Issue -, Pages 2-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.09.035

Keywords

bioinformatics; nematode; C. briggsae; MicroRNA targets; MiRNA-mRNA duplex

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MicroRNAs (miRNTAs) are endogenous similar to 22-nucleotide (nt) non-coding RNAs that post-transcriptionally regulate the expression of target genes via hybridization to target mRNA. Using known pairs of miRNA and target mRNA in Caenorhabditis elegans, we first performed computational analysis for specific hybridization patterns between these two RNAs. We counted the numbers of perfectly complementary dinucleotide sequences and calculated the free energy within complementary base pairs of each dinucleotide, observed by sliding a 2-nt window along all nucleotides of the miRNA-mRNA duplex. We confirmed not only strong base pairing within the 5' region of miRNAs (nts 1-8) in C elegans, but also the required mismatch within the central region (nt 9 or nt 10), and we found weak binding within the 3' region (nts 13-14). We also predicted 687 possible miRNA target transcripts, many of which are thought to be involved in C. elegans development, by combining the abovementioned hybridization tendency with the following analyses: (1) prediction of the miRNA-mRNA duplex with free-energy minimization; (2) identification of the complementary pattern within the miRNA-mRNA duplex; (3) conservation of target sites between C elegans and C briggsae, a related soil nematode; and (4) extraction of mRNA candidates with multiple target sites. Rigorous tests using shuffled miRNA controls supported these predictions. Our results Suggest that rniRNAs recognize their target rnRNAs by their hybridization pattern and that many target mRNAs may be regulated through a combination of several specific miRNA target sites in C elegans. (C) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available