4.6 Article

Locoregional Control of Thoracoscopic Lobectomy With Selective Lymphadenectomy for Lung Cancer

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 235-239

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.049

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. In this retrospective study, we review our experience with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy with selective lymphadenectomy for clinical stage I lung cancer and report the long-term results. Methods. From April 1999 to December 2006, 355 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer underwent a VATS lobectomy. The perioperative data, morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival of each patient were reviewed. Results. A thoracoscopic lobectomy was performed successfully in 348 patients (T1 N0, 237 patients; T2 N0, 111 patients), and a selective lymphadenectomy was performed in 268. Seven procedures (2.0%) were uneventfully converted to a thoracotomy and were excluded. The median operation time was 192 minutes, and the median blood loss was 100 mL. The median postoperative stay was 6 days. There were no intraoperative deaths; 2 patients died within 30 days of operation (mortality; 0.6%); 1 died of bacterial pneumonia and the other of postoperative interstitial pneumonia exacerbation. Postoperative complications occurred in 54 patients (16% morbidity). Major complications included prolonged air leak (3.7%), bacterial pneumonia (3.4%), and mild arrhythmia (3.4%). Pathologic upstaging was noted in 67 patients (19%). At a median follow-up of 43 months, total recurrence occurred in 66 cases (26 locoregional and 40 distant). The locoregional recurrence rate was 0.021 per person per year. The overall and 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rates were 78.5% and 76.6%, respectively. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that performing VATS lobectomy with selective lymphadenectomy for clinical stage I lung cancer is safe and results in acceptable locoregional control. (Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90:235-9) (C) 2010 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available