4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of hepatitis B virus surface antigen co-administered with an immunostimulatory phosphorothioate oligonucleotide and a licensed hepatitis B vaccine in healthy young adults

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 20-26

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.08.095

Keywords

hepatitis B vaccine; immunostimulatory sequences; randomized clinical trial

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background:: Many individuals do not respond to a three-dose series of hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) and most do not achieve a protective antibody response until after dose 2 or 3. Methods:: Healthy, seronegative 18-28 year old adults were randomly assigned in equal numbers to receive two doses of the experimental vaccine (HBV-ISS without alum) (0, 8 weeks) and placebo (24 weeks) or Engerix-B-(R) (0, 8, 24 weeks). Adverse events were collected during the first week and at 4 weeks after each injection. Antibodies were measured 4 weeks after dose 1; before, 1 and 4 weeks after dose 2, and before, 1 and 4 weeks after dose 3 and at 1 year. Results:: Ninety-nine participants were enrolled (65% female; mean age 22.6 years). 79% of HBV-ISS and 12% of Engerix-B-(R) recipients had a protective antibody response 4 weeks post dose 1 (geometric mean concentration [GMC] 23.0 and 1.87 mIU/mL, respectively). By 1 week post dose 2, 100% of HBV-ISS and 18% Engerix-B-(R) recipients had protective levels (GMC 1603 versus 2.40 mIU/mL). Rates of adverse events were low and similar in both groups; headache and fatigue were the most common systemic adverse events in up to 1/3 of both groups. Mild injection-site tenderness was more common after HBV-ISS than Engerix-B-(R) after both doses (74-77% compared to 34-58%; p <= 0.029). Conclusions:: Protective levels are achieved more quickly and after fewer doses of HBV-ISS than Engerix-B-(R). HBV-ISS is well tolerated but associated with more mild injection-site tenderness than Engerix-B-(R). (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available