4.8 Article

Polyethylenimine nanoparticles as efficient transfecting agents for mammalian cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages 457-468

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.10.014

Keywords

nanoparticles; polyethyleneimine; polyethylene glycol; transfection; DNA retardation; cell viability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two cross-linkers based on polyethylene glycol (PEG) (MW=6 and 8 kDa), were synthesized for self-assembling and formation of nanoparticles of branched, high molecular weight polyethylenimine (PEI). Cross-linking was realized in two ways, viz., ionic as well as covalent. Ionic cross-linking was accomplished by using PEG-bis (phosphate) whereas, the covalent one was achieved by using PEG-bis (p-nitrophenylcarbonate). A range of nanoparticles of PEI was prepared by varying the degree of cross-linking (i.e. the amount of cross-linkers used). PEI-PEG nanoparticles were characterized by dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy and found to be in the range of similar to 18-75 nm (hydrodynamic radii) with almost uniform population. Subsequently, these particles were used for DNA binding assay and zeta-potential measurements, taking native PEI-PEG nanoparticles as reference. As expected, the zeta potential values decreased, on increasing the percentage of cross-linking as well as on complexation with DNA. Further, PEI-PEG nanoparticles were investigated for their transfecting efficacy on COS-1 cells. It was found that PEI-PEG nanoparticles were 5- to 16-fold more efficient as transfecting agents compared to lipofectin and PEI itself The toxicity of PEI-PEG nanoparticles was found to be reduced considerably in comparison to PEI polymer, as determined by MTT colorimetric assay. Out of the various systems prepared, PEI-PEG(8000) (5% ionic) nanoparticles were found to be the most efficient transfecting agent for in vitro transfection. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available