4.7 Article

Scaling mass profiles around elliptical galaxies observed with Chandra and XMM-Newton

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 636, Issue 2, Pages 698-711

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/498081

Keywords

galaxies : elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies : ISM; X-rays : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the dynamical structure of 53 elliptical galaxies using the Chandra archival X-ray data. In X-ray luminous galaxies, temperature increases with radius and gas density is systematically higher at the optical outskirts, indicating the presence of a significant amount of the group-scale hot gas. In contrast, X-ray-dim galaxies show a flat or declining temperature profile against radius and the gas density is relatively lower at the optical outskirts. Thus, it is found that X-ray-bright and faint elliptical galaxies are clearly distinguished by the temperature and gas density profile. The mass profile is well scaled by a virial radius r(200) rather than an optical half-radius r(e), is quite similar at (0.001 - 0: 03) r(200) between X-ray-luminous and dim galaxies, and smoothly connects to those profiles of clusters of galaxies. At the inner region of (0.001 0: 01) r(200) or (0.1 - 1) r(e), the mass profile well traces a stellar mass with a constant mass-to-light ratio ofM/ LB 3-10 M circle dot/L circle dot. The M/LB ratio of X-ray-bright galaxies rises up steeply beyond 0.01r(200) and thus requires a presence of massive dark matter halo. From the deprojection analysis combined with the XMM-Newton data, we found that X-ray-dim galaxies NGC 3923, NGC 720, and IC 1459 also have a high M/LB ratio of 20 30 at 20 kpc, comparable to that of X-ray-luminous galaxies. Therefore, dark matter is indicated to be common in elliptical galaxies; their dark matter distribution, as well as that of galaxy clusters, almost follows the NFW profile.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available