4.3 Article

Staphylococcus aureus lipotechoic acid induces differential expression of bovine serum amyloid A3 (SAA3) by mammary epithelial cells: Implications for early diagnosis of mastitis

Journal

VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
Volume 109, Issue 1-2, Pages 79-83

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2005.07.023

Keywords

Staphylococcus aureus; lipotechoic acid; bovine serum amyloid A3; mammary gland; mastitis diagnostic marker

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mastitis is one of the most costly diseases of agriculturally important animals and is a common problem for lactating cows. Current methods used to detect clinical and especially subclinical mastitis are either inadequate or problematic. Pathogens such as the gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus or the gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli typically cause mastitis. E. coli induces clinical mastitis, whereas, S. aureus causes a subclinical, chronic infection of the mammary gland. In this study we report the differential expression and secretion of mammary-derived serum amyloid A3 (SAA3) by bovine mammary epithelial cells following stimulation with the S. aureus cell wall component, lipotechoic acid (LTA). Two-dimensional immunoblot analyses confirmed that bovine SAA3 is the predominant SAA isoform produced by LTA stimulated mammary epithelial cells. Our previous study showed that bovine SAA3 is also differentially expressed in response to the gram-negative bacteria] endotoxin lipopolysaccharide. Collectively, these data indicate that the local production of SAA3 by mammary epithelia] cells in response to either gram-positive or gram-negative bacterial components may provide a sensitive indicator for early detection and treatment of mastitis in vivo, minimizing chronic cases of infection, the spread of mastitis to other animals, and economic losses. (C) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available