4.6 Article

Decay-accelerating factor prevents acute humoral rejection induced by low levels of anti-αGal natural antibodies

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 81, Issue 1, Pages 95-100

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000188176.18666.68

Keywords

humoral rejection; antibodies; alpha Gal; decay-accelerating factor

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL 18646] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Hyperacute and delayed vascular rejection due to natural antibodies (NAb) present major obstacles in pig-to-primate xenotransplantation. Although supraphysiologic expression of human complement regulatory proteins (CRPs) can prevent hyperacute rejection in discordant xenogenic recipients, their physiologic role in the homologous setting is undefined. We have evaluated the effect of the absence of decay-accelerating factor (DAF) on cardiac allograft rejection in the presence of different levels of antidonor antibodies (Ab). Methods. DAF1-deficient (DAF KO; B6129F2 H-2(b)) mice were used as heart graft donors to alpha 1,3-galactosyltransferase deficient (GalT KO; B6, H-2(b)) recipients. Heterotopic heart grafting was performed with or without presensitization. Graft survival, histology, and anti-alpha Gal Ab levels were monitored. Results. DAF knockout (KO) but not wild-type (WT) grafts showed hyperacute or acute humoral rejection in nonsensitized GAT KO mice with low levels of anti-alpha Gal I-M NAb. However, humoral rejection of both DAF KO and DAF WT donor grafts occurred in presensitized GAT KO recipients. Conclusions. The expression of DAF prevents hyperacute rejection in mice with low titers of anti-alpha Gal antibody. These studies demonstrate the physiologic role of DAF in preventing humoral rejection in the presence of low levels of NAb and have implications for transplantation of discordant vascularized xenografts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available