4.6 Article

Sequence, distance, and accessibility are determinants of 5′-end-directed cleavages by retroviral RNases H

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 281, Issue 4, Pages 1943-1955

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M510504200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R37 CA051605, R01 CA051605, CA 51605] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The RNase H activity of reverse transcriptase is essential for retroviral replication. RNA5'-end-directed cleavages represent a form of RNase H activity that is carried out on RNA/DNA hybrids that contain a recessed RNA 5'-end. Previously, the distance from the RNA 5'-end has been considered the primary determinant for the location of these cleavages. Employing model hybrid substrates and the HIV-1 and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptases, we demonstrate that cleavage sites correlate with specific sequences and that the distance from the RNA 5'-end determines the extent of cleavage. An alignment of sequences flanking multiple RNA 5'-end-directed cleavage sites reveals that both enzymes strongly prefer A or U at the +1 position and C or G at the -2 position, and additionally for HIV-1, A is disfavored at the -4 position. For both enzymes, 5'-end-directed cleavages occurred when sites were positioned between the 13th and 20th nucleotides from the RNA 5'-end, a distance termed the cleavage window. In examining the importance of accessibility to the RNA5'-end, it was found that the extent of 5'-end-directed cleavages observed in substrates containing a free recessed RNA5'-end was most comparable to substrates with a gap of two or three bases between the upstream and downstream RNAs. Together these finding demonstrate that the selection of 5'-end-directed cleavage sites by retroviral RNases H results from a combination of nucleotide sequence, permissible distance, and accessibility to the RNA 5'-end.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available