4.4 Article

Comparison of biophysical and biologic properties of α-helical enantiomeric antimicrobial peptides

Journal

CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages 162-173

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2006.00349.x

Keywords

alpha-helical peptides; antimicrobial activity; antimicrobial peptides; enantiomers; hemolytic activity; mechanism

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R37 AI015940, R01 AI048717, R01 AI067296-02, R01 AI067296, R01 AI015940, R04AI48717, AI15940] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01GM61855, R01 GM061855] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In our previous study (Chen et al. J Biol Chem 2005, 280:12316-12329), we utilized an alpha-helical antimicrobial peptide V-681 as the framework to study the effects of peptide hydrophobicity, amphipathicity, and helicity on biologic activities where we obtained several V-681 analogs with dramatic improvement in peptide therapeutic indices against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. In the present study, the D-enantiomers of three peptides - V-681, V13A(D) and V13K(L) were synthesized to compare biophysical and biologic properties with their enantiomeric isomers. Each D-enantiomer was shown by circular dichroism spectroscopy to be a mirror image of the corresponding L-isomer in benign conditions and in the presence of 50% trifluoroethanol. L- and D-enantiomers exhibited equivalent antimicrobial activities against a diverse group of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates, various gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria and a fungus. In addition, L- and D-enantiomeric peptides were equally active in their ability to lyse human red blood cells. The similar activity of L- and D-enantiomeric peptides on prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell membranes suggests that there are no chiral receptors and the cell membrane is the sole target for these peptides. Peptide D-V13K(D) showed significant improvements in the therapeutic indices compared with the parent peptide V-681 by 53-fold against P. aeruginosa strains, 80-fold against gram-negative bacteria, 69-fold against gram-positive bacteria, and 33-fold against Candida albicans. The excellent stability of D-enantiomers to trypsin digestion (no proteolysis by trypsin) compared with the rapid breakdown of the L-enantiomers highlights the advantage of the D-enantiomers and their potential as clinical therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available