4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Into thin air: Physiology and evolution of alpine insects

Journal

INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 49-61

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/icb/icj007

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synopsis Numerous physical parameters that influence insect physiology vary Substantially with altitude, including temperature, air density, and oxygen partial pressure. Here, we review existing literature and present new empirical data to better characterize the high-altitude environment, and then consider how this environment affects the physiology and evolution of insects. Using weather balloon data from fifty-three sites across the globe, we estimate a mean altitudinal temperature lapse rate of 6.0 degrees C/km. We also present empirically determined lapse rates for P, and air density. The temperature decline with elevation may substantially compromtise insect thermoregulation at high altitude. However, heat-transfer models predict that lower air density at elevation reduces convective heat loss of insects by to a surprisingly large degree. This effect combined with behavioral thermo regulation and the availability of buffered microhabitats make the net thermal consequences of highaltitude residence strongly context-specific. The decline in Po, with elevation may compromise insect development and physiology, but its effects are difficult to predict without simultaneously considering temperature and air density. Flying insects compensate for low air densities with both short-term responses, Such as increased stroke amplitude (but not wingbeat frequency), and with long-term developmental and/or evolutionary increases in wing size relative to body size. Finally, in contrast to predictions based on Bergmann's Rule, a literature survey of thirty-six insect species suggests that those living in colder, higher altitudes do not tend to have larger body sizes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available