4.8 Article

A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 327-337

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj038

Keywords

Saccharomyces cerevisiae; evolutionary rate; gene expression; protein-protein interactions; dispensability; translational selection

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 065960] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [5 T32 MH19138] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A gene's rate of sequence evolution is among the most fundamental evolutionary quantities in common use, but what determines evolutionary rates has remained unclear. Here, we carry out the first combined analysis of seven predictors (gene expression level, dispensability, protein abundance, codon adaptation index, gene length, number of protein-protein interactions, and the gene's centrality in the interaction network) previously reported to have independent influences on protein evolutionary rates. Strikingly, our analysis reveals a single dominant variable linked to the number of translation events which explains 40-fold more variation in evolutionary rate than any other, suggesting that protein evolutionary rate has a single major determinant among the seven predictors. The dominant variable explains nearly half the variation in the rate of synonymous and protein evolution. We show that the two most commonly used methods to disentangle the determinants of evolutionary rate, partial correlation analysis and ordinary multivariate regression, produce misleading or spurious results when applied to noisy biological data. We overcome these difficulties by employing principal component regression, a multivariate regression of evolutionary rate against the principal components of the predictor variables. Our results support the hypothesis that translational selection governs the rate of synonymous and protein sequence evolution in yeast.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available