4.2 Article

The ketogenic diet: From molecular mechanisms to clinical effects

Journal

EPILEPSY RESEARCH
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 145-180

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2005.10.003

Keywords

ketogenic diet; epilepsy; mechanisms of action; efficacy; safety; review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent years have witnessed an increased interest from pediatric neurologists, neuropediatricians, epileptologists and general neurologists in the use of the ketogenic diet (KD) for the management of refractory epilepsies, particularly in children and adolescents. This article summarizes current knowledge on various issues related to its use, as discussed at a recent international workshop. Aspects discussed in some detail include (i) the putative mechanisms responsible for the diet's anticonvulsant effects, based on results of biochemical and neurophysiological studies in experimental models; (ii) consensus and controversies on the modalities of initiation of the diet, and different protocols of implementation; (iii) indications and contraindications; (iv) efficacy data, also in relation to seizure type, syndromic form and patients age; (v) adverse effects; (vi) methodological aspects related to assessment of the diet's clinical effects, and perspectives for future research. Overall, the data reviewed indicate that considerable advances have been made in understanding the modes of action of the diet, its efficacy and tolerability profiles and its potential role in different types of epilepsy. Although clinical studies performed to date have important methodological limitations, including suboptimally characterized patients' populations and an uncontrolled design, a number of innovative, prospective randomized study protocols have been recently proposed and are being implemented. The results of these will hopefully provide much needed high-quality information to better define the role of the diet in the treatment algorithms in different epilepsy syndromes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available