4.5 Article

Impaired coronary and myocardial flow in severe aortic stenosis is associated with increased apoptosis: a transthoracic Doppler and myocardial contrast echocardiography study

Journal

HEART
Volume 92, Issue 2, Pages 208-212

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.062422

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To test the hypothesis that impaired coronary and myocardial blood flow are linked with increased myocyte apoptosis, thus establishing a link between pressure overload and left ventricular ( LV) remodelling. Methods and results: Peak diastolic coronary blood flow velocity (CBFV) was evaluated at transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, and signal intensity ( SI) and the rate of SI rise (b) were measured at myocardial contrast echocardiography in 11 patients with severe aortic stenosis and LV hypertrophy. In the same patients, biopsies were obtained from the anterolateral LV free wall during surgery and analysed for cardiomyocyte apoptosis. LV mass corrected CBFV (CBFVI) was significantly lower in patients than in controls ( median 0.100 cm center dot g/ s ( interquartile range 0.07 - 0.115) v 0.130 cm center dot g/ s ( 0.130 - 0.160), p = 0.002). Similarly, SI*beta was significantly lower in patients than in controls (11 1/s (8 - 66) v 83 1/s ( 73 - 95), p = 0.001). Apoptotic rate was increased in aortic stenosis more than 100-fold versus controls (1.2% (0.8 - 1.4) v 0.01% (0.01 - 0.01), p< 0.001) and inversely correlated with lower CBFVI and SI*beta ( r = -0.77, p = 0.001 for both). Conclusions: Patients with severe aortic stenosis and LV hypertrophy have impaired myocardial perfusion, which is associated with enhanced cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Impaired myocardial perfusion and the ensuing oxygen demand - supply imbalance may, at least partially, be responsible for increased apoptosis and possible transition to heart failure, thus establishing a link between pressure overload, LV remodelling, and heart failure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available