4.4 Article

Quantitative study of changes in oxidative metabolism during visual stimulation using absolute relaxation rates

Journal

NMR IN BIOMEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 60-68

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1001

Keywords

functional magnetic resonance imaging; BOLD; blood oxygenation level-dependent signal; cerebral blood flow; oxygen cerebral metabolic rate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the context of quantitative functional MRI (fMRI), deoxyhemoglobin (dHb) content is the essential physiological parameter for calibrating the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal. In studies on humans, the baseline dHb content or its equivalent has been evaluated indirectly by means of carbon dioxide breathing as a physiological reference condition. In this study with normal volunteers, quantitative mapping of baseline dHb content was performed in a direct manner by measuring the reversible contribution of the effective transverse relaxation rate. The BOLD signal change in the visual cortex during 8 Hz flicker visual stimulation was calibrated based on the quantitative map of baseline dHb content. The calibrated relaxation rate change that represents the stimulation- induced fractional change of dHb content decreased by 14% within the activated visual cortex. Simultaneous measurement of cerebral blood flow (CBF) with BOLD showed an increase of 59%. From the calibrated relaxation rate and CBF changes, the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) was calculated to increase by 19-28% within the activated visual cortex. The ratio of the CBF increase to the CMRO2 increase was 2-3: 1, which agreed well with results of similar quantitative fMRI studies for humans. The method proposed here for quantitative evaluation of the BOLD signal may be applicable not only to fMRl for normal human subjects, but also to physiologically altered or diseased states, because it requires no physiological perturbation. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available