4.4 Article

Inactivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and polyphenoloxidase in mango nectar treated with UV light

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 362-368

Publisher

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-69.2.362

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fresh mango nectar was processed by UV light at five flow rates (0.073 to 0.451 liter/min) and five UV light doses (75 to 450 kJ/m(2)) to evaluate total microbial load, Saccharomyces cerevisiae survival, and polyphenoloxidase activity. UV systems containing an inner mercury lamp (254 nm) each with intensity of 25 mW/cm(2) were used as germicidal sources. In addition, mango nectar was treated for 15 min at 0.073 and 0.451 liter/min, stored at 3 degrees C, and evaluated periodically for total microbial count, yeast count, color, and polyphenoloxidase activity. The first-order kinetics modeling found that D-UV-values in mango nectar ranged from 27.9 to 10.9 min (R-2 > 0.950) and 26.0 to 11.8 min (R-2 > 0.962) for total microbial count and yeast count, respectively. The maximum log reduction (CFU per milliliter) was 2.71 and 2.94 for total microbial count and yeast count, respectively, after 30 min of UV treatment at 0.451 liter/min. D-UV-values ranging from 156 to 204 min were observed for polyphenoloxidase activity. The remaining polyphenoloxidase activity after 30 min of UV treatment at 0.451 liter/min was 19 +/- 4%. Initial microbial load and yeast in stored mango nectar were reduced in the range 2.86 to 3.41 and 1.82 to 1.97 log (CFU/ml) cycles, respectively. No substantial microbial growth was observed prior to 20 days of storage. Averages of 1,055 +/- 32, 803 +/- 32, and 710 +/- 37 enzyme activity units were observed in mango nectar UV processed at 0, 0.073, and 0.451 liter/min, respectively, during the entire storage period. However, mango nectar treated at 0.073 and 0.451 liter/min maintained a yellow and yellow-orange color, respectively, after 26 days of storage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available