4.5 Article

Complexation of mercury by dissolved organic matter in surface waters of Galveston Bay, Texas

Journal

MARINE CHEMISTRY
Volume 98, Issue 2-4, Pages 156-166

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2005.07.004

Keywords

mercury; chemical speciation; dissolved organic matter; stability constants; USA; Texas; Galveston Bay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical speciation of dissolved mercury in surface waters of Galveston Bay was determined using the concentrations of mercury-complexing ligands and conditional stability constants of mercury-ligand complexes. Two classes of natural ligands associated with dissolved organic matter were determined by a competitive ligand exchange-solvent solvent extraction (CLE-SSE) method: a strong class (L-S), ranging from 19 to 93 pM with an average conditional stability constant (K-HgLs) of 10(28), and a weak class (L-w) ranging from 1.4 to 9.8 nM with an average K-HgLs of 10(23). The range of conditional stability constants between mercury and natural ligands suggested that sulfides and thiolates are important binding sites for dissolved mercury in estuarine waters. A positive correlation between the estuarine distribution of dissolved glutathione and that of mercury-complexing ligands supported this suggestion. Thermodynamic equilibrium modeling using stability constants for HgL, HgClx, Hg(OH)(x), and HgCl(OH) and concentrations of each ligand demonstrated that almost all of the dissolved mercury (> 99%) in Galveston Bay was complexed by natural ligands associated with dissolved organic matter. The importance of low concentrations of high-affinity ligands that may originate in the biological system (i.e., glutathione and phytochelatin) suggests that the greater portion of bulk dissolved organic matter may not be important for mercury complexation in estuarine surface waters. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available