4.6 Article

Evaluation of different treatment modalities for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN):: CO2 laser vaporization, photodynamic therapy, excision and vulvectomy

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 2, Pages 271-275

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.08.012

Keywords

laser vaporization; photodynamic therapy; ALA; vulvectomy; vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia; recurrence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. To evaluate various treatment modalities for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) in relation to possible risk factors for recurrence. Methods. Retrospective review of 93 patients with VIN treated by CO, laser vaporization, photodynamic therapy with aminolevulinic acid (PDT), excision or vulvectomy. Results. 40.4% of the 47 patients with laser vaporization, 48.1% of 27 patients with PDT, 42% of 12 patients with local excision and none of the 7 patients treated by vulvectomy experienced a relapse within a mean follow-up of 53.7 months. The risk for recurrence significantly increased with VIN grade (P = 0.02), multifocal VIN disease (P = 0.01), multicentric intraepithelial neoplasia (P = 0.05) and high-risk HPV infection (P < 0.001). In inultivariate analysis, only HPV status remained significant (P = 0.012) and, if HPV testing is not available, multifocality ( P = 0.03). The lowest rate of postoperative side effects was noted in patients after PDT. There was one (1%) case of progression to vulvar cancer. Conclusions. Vulva preserving treatment methods for VIN have high recurrence rates, especially in patients with HPV infection and multifocal disease. Therefore, careful long-term surveillance is mandatory. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available