4.6 Article

Epidemiology and correlates of daily smoking and nicotine dependence among young adults in the United States

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages 299-308

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.057232

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [P01 HD031921, P01 HD 31921] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [DA 13288, K05 DA000081, R01 DA013288, DA 00081] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [MH 30906] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. We describe the epidemiology of smoking behaviors in a national young adult sample and identify common and unique demographic, social, and psychological correlates of daily smoking and lifetime and current nicotine dependence by race/ethnicity. Methods. Data are from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health, wave III. Dependence was measured by the Revised Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence. Logistic regressions were estimated. Results. Hispanic ethnicity, low education, parental and peer smoking, novelty seeking, early age of smoking onset, and pleasurable initial smoking experiences are significantly correlated with daily smoking and lifetime nicotine dependence. Depressive symptoms are uniquely associated with lifetime and current dependence. Few factors are highly associated with current dependence. Initial sensitivity to smoking has a significantly greater impact on daily smoking than on dependence. Correlates of smoking behaviors are mostly common across racial/ethnic groups, although parental and peer smoking are significant for Whites and Hispanics but not for African Americans. Conclusions. There are more common than unique correlates of each smoking stage and across racial/ethnic groups. Primary prevention and interventions addressing the factors tested could be uniform for most chronic smokers irrespective of dependence status and race/ethnicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available