4.7 Article

Actions of the FAAH inhibitor URB597 in neuropathic and inflammatory chronic pain models

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 147, Issue 3, Pages 281-288

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706510

Keywords

pain; neuropathic; inflammatory; cannabinoid; fatty-acid amide hydrolase

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA12447, DA-12413, R01 DA012413, R01 DA012447] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1 While cannabinoid receptor agonists have analgesic activity in chronic pain states, they produce a spectrum of central CB1 receptor-mediated motor and psychotropic side effects. The actions of endocannabinoids, such as anandamide are terminated by removal from the extracellular space, then subsequent enzymatic degradation by fatty-acid amide hydrolase ( FAAH). In the present study, we compared the effect of a selective FAAH inhibitor, URB597, to that of a pan-cannabinoid receptor agonist HU210 in rat models of chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain. 2 Systemic administration of URB597 (0.3 mg kg(-1)) and HU210 (0.03 mg kg(-1)) both reduced the mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in the CFA model of inflammatory pain. In contrast, HU210, but not URB597, reduced mechanical allodynia in the partial sciatic nerve-ligation model of neuropathic pain. HU210, but not URB597, produced a reduction in motor performance in unoperated rats. 3 The effects of URB597 in the CFA model were dose dependent and were reduced by coadministration with the cannabinoid CB1 antagonist AM251 (1 mg kg(-1)), or the CB2 and SR144528 (1 mg kg(-1)). Coadministration with AM251 plus SR144528 completely reversed the effects of URB597. 4 These findings suggest that the FAAH inhibitor URB597 produces cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor-mediated analgesia in inflammatory pain states, without causing the undesirable side effects associated with cannabinoid receptor activation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available