4.7 Article

Experimental complexities in evaluating the allelopathic activities in laboratory bioassays: A case study

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 256-262

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.05.004

Keywords

allelopathy; charcoal; Chenopodium murale; phenolics; microbial nutrient immobilization

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil is the major player in deciding allelopathic activities. A study was designed to examine experimental complexities in determining the allelopathic behavior of soil amended with water-soluble leachates from Chenopodium murale. Chenopodium murale interferes with the growth and establishment of crop seedlings. The present study examined the role of water-soluble organic substances, if any, in the shoot growth suppression of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice seeds were grown on C. murale leaf leachate-amended soil to investigate the phytotoxic effects of C. murale leachates. Any modification of C murale phytotoxic activities was studied through using abiotic soil, activated charcoal and nitrogen (N) fertilization. Chemical and microbiological analysis of C. murale-amended soil was made to evaluate the role of soil components in C. murale phytotoxicity. Significant inhibition in the shoot growth of rice was observed when abiotic or biotic soil was amended with full-strength leaf leachate (T I) of C. murale compared to unamended soils. The inhibitory effect of T1 is maintained when rice seeds were placed on T1-amended soil after 0, 24 or 48 h; however, the inhibitory effects were eliminated when seeds were placed on amended soil after 72, 96 h or I wk of incubating soil with T I. Activated charcoal (1, 2 or 4 g) could not eliminate the inhibitory effects of T1-amended soil to the shoot length of rice. The phytotoxic effects of T1-amended soil to the shoot length of lice, however, were largely eliminated after the addition of N fertilization. Interference of C murale leaf leachate to rice shoot growth could be due to number of effects that could be misconstrued as allelopathy effects. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available