4.6 Article

Measuring hemoglobin oxygen saturation during graded hypoxic hypoxia in rat striatum

Journal

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages 565-570

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000185039.85886.e3

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated in vivo reflectance spectroscopy of visible light as a method to assess brain tissue hemoglobin oxygen saturation in rat striatum (SstrO(2)). Seven anesthetized and mechanically ventilated rats were subjected to incremental reduction in the fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO): 0.35,0.25,0.15,0.12, and 0.10, followed by a reoxygenation period (Group 1). At each episode, local changes in SstrO(2) and in cerebral blood flow (LCBF) were simultaneously determined in the two striatal regions, using reflectance spectroscopy and laser Doppler flowmetry, respectively. Another group of rats (Group 2, n = 6) was also studied to measure sagittal sinus blood hemoglobin saturation (SssO(2)) during graded hypoxic hypoxia. Corpus striatum exhibited a significant graded decrease in SstrO(2), from 38% +/- 17% at FIO2 of 0.35 (control) to 16% +/- 10% at FIO2 of 0.12 and to 13% +/- 7% at FIO2 of 0.10 (P < 0.05), with no difference between the two hemispheres. These local changes in SstrO(2) were associated with a significant graded increase in LCBF: 161% +/- 26% of control values and 197% +/- 34% during these 2 hypoxic episodes, respectively (P < 0.05). All local changes were fully reversed during the reoxygenation period. In Group 2, SssO(2) decreased from 38% +/- 8% at FIO2 of 0.35 (control) to 10% +/- 3% at FIO2 of 0-10, closely related to SstrO(2) decreasing in hypoxia. This study shows that reflectance spectroscopy of the visible light in rat striatum could be a possible measure of continuous changes in SstrO(2). SssO(2) and LCBF measurements during graded hypoxic hypoxia indicate that changes in SstrO(2) reflect primarily those in brain venous oxygenation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available