4.4 Article

Lupin kernel fibre foods improve bowel function and beneficially modify some putative faecal risk factors for colon cancer in men

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages 372-378

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1079/BJN20051648

Keywords

lupin; dietary fibre; legume; bowel function; faeces; SCFA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Consumption of some dietary fibres may benefit bowel health; however, the effect of Australian sweet lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) kernel fibre (LKFibre) is unknown. The present study examined the effect of a high-fibre diet containing LKFibre on bowel function and faecal putative risk factors for colon cancer compared to a control diet without LKFibre. Thirty-eight free-living, healthy men consumed an LKFibre and a control diet for 1 month each in a single-blind, randomized, crossover study. Depending on subject energy intake, the LKFibre diet was designed to provide 17-30 g/d fibre (in experimental foods) above that of the control diet. Bowel function self-perception, frequency of defecation, transit time, faecal output, pH and moisture, faecal levels of SCFA and ammonia, and faecal bacterial beta-glucuronidase activity were assessed. In comparison to the control diet, the LKFibre diet increased frequency of defecation by 0 center dot 13 events/d (P=0 center dot 047), increased faecal output by 21 % (P=0 center dot 020) and increased faecal moisture content by 1 center dot 6 % units (P=0 center dot 027), whilst decreasing transit time by 17 % (P=0 center dot 012) and decreasing faecal pH by 0 center dot 26 units (P < 0 center dot 001). Faecal butyrate concentration was increased by 16 % (P=0 center dot 006), butyrate output was increased by 40 % (P=0 center dot 002) and beta-glucuronidase activity was lowered by 1 center dot 4 mu mol/h per g wet faeces compared to the control diet (P < 0 center dot 001). Addition of LKFibre to the diet incorporated into food products improved some markers of healthy bowel function and colon cancer risk in men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available