4.5 Article

Tomato juice prevents senescence-accelerated mouse P1 strain from developing emphysema induced by chronic exposure to tobacco smoke

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00483.2004

Keywords

oxidant; antioxidant; vascular endothelial growth factor; apoptosis; aging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The senescence-accelerated mouse (SAM) is a naturally occurring animal model for accelerated aging after normal development and maturation. SAMP1 strain was reported to show age-related structural and functional changes in lung and to be a murine model of senile lung. We postulated that aging of lung is an important intrinsic process for development of emphysema and even in a short period of tobacco smoke exposure may be able to generate emphysema. At age 12 wk, SAMP1 inhaled air or 1.5% tobacco smoke ( total particulate matter 23.9 mg/m(3)) through the nose for 30 min/day, 5 days/wk, and for 8 wk. The mean linear intercepts (MLI) and destructive index (DI) of lung were significantly increased [air vs. smoke (means +/- SE); MLI, 68.76 +/- 0.69 vs. 75.34 +/- 1.70 mu m, P < 0.05 and DI, 8.61 +/- 0.38 vs. 16.18 +/- 1.54%, P < 0.05], whereas no significant changes were observed in SAMR1, control mice that show normal aging. In contrast, smoke-induced emphysema was completely prevented by concomitant ingestion of lycopene given as tomato juice [MLI: smoke with/without lycopene (mean +/- SE), 62.87 +/- 0.8 vs. 66.90 +/- 1.33 mu m, P < 0.05]. Smoke exposure increased apoptosis and active caspase-3 of airway and alveolar septal cells and reduced VEGF in lung tissues, but tomato juice ingestion significantly reduced apoptosis and increased tissue VEGF level. We conclude that SAMP1 is a useful model for tobacco smoke-induced emphysema and a valuable tool to explore both pathophysiological mechanisms and the effect of therapeutic intervention on smoke-induced emphysema.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available