4.7 Article

High-resolution MRI assessment of dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis shows flexor tendon pulley and sheath-related enthesitis

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages 185-189

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205839

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G108/444]
  2. Arthritis Research UK [13968]
  3. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2007-02-001] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Versus Arthritis [18475] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Dactylitis is a hallmark of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) where flexor tenosynovitis is common. This study explored the microanatomical basis of dactylitis using high-resolution MRI (hrMRI) to visualise the small entheses around the digits. Methods Twelve patients with psoriatic dactylitis (4 fingers, 8 toes), and 10 healthy volunteers (6 fingers, 4 toes) had hrMRI of the digits using a 'microscopy' coil and contrast enhancement. All structures were evaluated including the tendons and ligaments, related enthesis organs, pulleys, volar/plantar plates and tendon sheaths. Results In dactylitis, collateral ligament enthesitis was seen in nine digits (75%), extensor tendon enthesitis in six digits (50%), functional enthesitis (5 digits, 42%), abnormal enhancement at the volar plates (2/5 joints, 40%) and the plantar plate (1/5 joints, 20%). Nine cases (75%) demonstrated flexor tenosynovitis, with flexor tendon pulley/flexor sheath microenthesopathy observed in 50% of all cases. Less abnormalities which were milder was observed in the normal controls, none of whom had any signal changes in the tendon pulleys or fibrous sheaths. Conclusions This study provides proof of concept for a link between dactylitis and 'digital polyenthesitis' including disease of the miniature enthesis pulleys of the flexor tendons, further affirming the concept of enthesitis in PsA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available