4.7 Article

ParEGO: A hybrid algorithm with on-line landscape approximation for expensive multiobjective optimization problems

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 50-66

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEVC.2005.851274

Keywords

design and analysis of computer experiments (DACE); efficient global optimization (EGO); expensive black-box functions; Kriging; landscape approximation; metamodels; multiobjective optimization; nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II); Pareto optima; performance assessment; response surfaces; test suites

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/A/00013] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_qA137293] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [MC_qA137293] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper concerns multiobjective optimization in scenarios where each solution evaluation is financially and/or temporally expensive. We make use of nine relatively low-dimensional, nonpathological, real-valued functions, such as arise in many applications, and assess the performance of two algorithms after just 100 and 250 (or 260) function evaluations. The results show that NSGA-II, a popular multiobjective evolutionary algorithm, performs well compared with random search, even within the restricted number of evaluations used. A significantly better performance (particularly, in the worst case) is, however, achieved on our test set by an algorithm proposed herein-ParEGO-which is an extension of the single-objective efficient global optimization (EGO) algorithm of Jones et al. ParEGO uses a design-of-experiments inspired initialization procedure and learns a Gaussian processes model of the search landscape, which is updated after every function evaluation. Overall, ParEGO exhibits a promising performance for multiobjective optimization problems where evaluations are expensive or otherwise restricted in number.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available