4.5 Article

A modified Atkins diet is effective for the treatment of intractable pediatric epilepsy

Journal

EPILEPSIA
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 421-424

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00438.x

Keywords

Atkins diet; ketogenic diet; epilepsy; children

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The Atkins diet may induce ketosis as does the ketogenic diet, without restrictions on calories, fluids, protein, or need for an inpatient fast and admission. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a modified Atkins diet for intractable childhood epilepsy. Methods: Twenty children were treated prospectively in a hospital-based ambulatory clinic from September 2003 to May 2005. Children aged 3 - 18 years, with at least three seizures per week, who had been treated with at least two anticonvulsants, were enrolled and received the diet over a 6-month period. Carbohydrates were initially limited to 10 g/day, and fats were encouraged. Parents measured urinary ketones semiweekly and recorded seizures daily. All children received vitamin and calcium supplementation. Results: In all children, at least moderate urinary ketosis developed within 4 days ( mean, 1.9). Sixteen ( 80%) completed the 6-month study; 14 chose to remain on the diet afterward. At 6 months, 13 ( 65%) had > 50% improvement, and seven ( 35%) had > 90% improvement ( four were seizure free). Mean seizure frequency after 6 months was 40 per week ( p = 0.005). Over a 6-month period, mean serum blood urea nitrogen increased from 12 to 17 mg/dl ( p = 0.01); creatinine was unchanged. Cholesterol increased from 192 to 221 mg/dl, ( p = 0.06). Weight did not change significantly ( 34.0-33.7 kg); only six children lost weight. A stable body mass index over time correlated with > 90% improvement ( p = 0.004). Conclusions: A modified Atkins diet is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for intractable pediatric epilepsy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available