4.6 Article

Repeated pulse of methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide with continuous dexamethasone therapy for patients with severe paraquat poisoning

Journal

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 368-373

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000195013.47004.A8

Keywords

paraquat poisoning; plasma paraquat levels; repeated pulse therapy; cyclophosphamide; methylprednisolone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Paraquat is widely used in the world, and all treatments for paraquat poisoning have been unsuccessful. Many patients have died of paraquat poisoning in developing countries. A novel anti-inflammation method was developed to treat severe paraquat-poisoned patients with >50% to <90% predictive mortality: initial pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (11 g/day for 3 days) and cyclophosphamide (15 mg/kg/day for 2 days), followed by dexamethasone 20 mg/day until PaO2 was >11.5 kPa (80 mm Hg) and repeated pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (1 g/day for 3 days) and cyclophosphamide (15 mg/kg/day for 1 day), which was repeated if PaO2 was <8.64 kPa (60 mm Hg). Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting. Academic medical center in Taiwan. Patients: Twenty-three paraquat-poisoned patients with >50% and <90% predictive mortality assessed by plasma paraquat levels were prospectively and randomly assigned to the control and study groups at a proportion of 1:2. Interventions. The control group received conventional therapy and the study group received the novel repeated pulse treatment with long-term steroid therapy. Measurements and Main Results: We measured patient mortality during the study period. There was not a different distribution of basal variables between the two study groups. The mortality rate (85.7%, six of seven) of the control group was higher than that of the study group (31.3%, five of 16; p =.0272). Conclusions: The novel anti-inflammatory therapy reduces the mortality rate for patients with severe paraquat poisoning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available