4.6 Article

Pediatric Intestinal Transplant Listing Criteria - A Call for a Change in the New Era of Intestinal Failure Outcomes

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 1674-1681

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13147

Keywords

Clinical decision-making; intestinal failure; injury; recipient selection

Funding

  1. Fresenius Kabi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current listing indications used for intestinal transplantation (IT) were proposed in 2001. We undertook the present single center study to see if these criteria are still valid. The 2001 criteria (advanced cholestasis, loss of >50% central venous catheter (CVC) sites, 2 sepsis/year, ultrashort bowel) were compared in children with intestinal failure in old era1998-2005 (N=99) to current era2006-2012 (N=91) to predict the need for IT using sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV. Two 2001 criteria had poorer predictive value in the current era: Advanced cholestasis (PPV 64% old vs. 40% current era; sensitivity 84% vs. 65%, respectively) and ultrashort bowel (PPV 100% old vs. 9% current era; sensitivity 10% vs. 4%, respectively). Three newly proposed criteria had high predictive value: 2 ICU admissions (p=0.0001, OR 23.6, 95% CI 2.7-209.8), persistent bilirubin >75mmol/L despite lipid strategies (p=0.0005, OR 24.0, 95% CI 3.2-177.4), and loss of 3 CVC sites (p=0.0003, OR 33.3, 95% CI 18.8-54.0). There was 98% probability of needing IT when two of these new criteria were present. The 2001 IT criteria have limited predictive ability in the current era and should be revised. A multicenter study is required to validate the findings of this single center experience.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available