3.8 Article

Mouse embryonic stem cells are not susceptible to cytomegalovirus but acquire susceptibility during differentiation

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20233

Keywords

ES cells; congenital cytomegalovirus infection; neural differentiation; transgenic mice; embryogenesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most significant infectious cause of congenital anomalies of the central nervous system caused by intrauterine infection in humans. The timing of infection and the susceptibility of cells in early gestational stages are not well understood. hi this study we investigated the susceptibility of embryonic stem (ES) cells to CMV infection during differentiation. METHODS: ES cell lines were established from transgenic mice integrated with the murine CMV (MCMV) immediate-early (IE) promoter connected with a reporter lacZ gene. The susceptibility of the ES cells was analyzed in terms of viral gene expression and viral replication after induction of differentiation. RESULTS: ES cells were nonpermissive to MCMV infection in the undifferentiated state. Upon differentiation, permissive cells appeared similar to 2 weeks after the leukemia inhibitory factor was removed. Upon neural differentiation by retinoic acid (RA), glial cells showed specific susceptibility in terms of expression of the viral antigen. The MCMV IE promoter was not activated in ES cells from the transgenic mice. Activation of the IE promoter was detected similar to 2 weeks after induction of differentiation and observed predominantly in glial cells. Upon MCMV infection of the ES cells, viral infection was correlated with the activation of the IE promoter. CONCLUSIONS: ES cells are nonpermissive to MCMV infection and acquire permissiveness about 2 weeks after induction of differentiation, especially in glial cells. Acquisition of permissiveness in differentiated ES cells may be associated with activation of the IE promoter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available