4.6 Article

Oral care reduces incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in ICU populations

Journal

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 230-236

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-0014-4

Keywords

oral care; oral hygiene; ventilator-associated pneumonia; hospital-acquired pneumonia; nosocomial infection; critical care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective:To examine whether oral care contributes to preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in ICU patients.Design:Nonrandomized trial with historical controls.Setting:A medical-surgical ICU in a university hospital.Patients:1,666 mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the ICU.Intervention:Oral care was provided to 1,252 patients who were admitted to the ICU during period between January 1997 and December 2002 (oral care group), while 414 patients who were admitted to the ICU during period between January1995 and December 1996 and who did not receive oral care served as historical controls (non-oral care group).Measurements and results:Incidence of VAP(episodes of pneumonia per 1000 ventilator days) in the oral care group was significantly lower than that in the non-oral care group (3.9 vs 10.4). The relative risk of VAP in the oral care group compared to that in the non-oral care group was 0.37, with an attributable risk of -3.96%. Furthermore, length of stay in ICU before onset of VAP was greater in the oral care than in the non-oral care group (8.5 +/- 4.6 vs 6.3 +/- 7.5 days). However, no significant difference was observed in either duration of mechanical ventilation or length of stay between the groups (5.9 +/- 0.8 vs 6.0 +/- 8.8 days and 7.5 +/- 11.5 vs 7.2 +/- 9.5 days, respectively). Pseudomonoas aeruginosa was the most frequently detected bacteria in both groups. Number of potentially pathogenic bacteria in oral cavity was significantly reduced by single oral care procedure.Conclusion:Oral care decreased the incidence of VAP in ICU patients.Descriptor:Pulmonary nosocomial infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available