4.7 Article

Relationships between climatic variables and sap flow, stem water potential and maximum daily trunk shrinkage in lemon trees

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 279, Issue 1-2, Pages 229-242

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-005-1302-z

Keywords

irrigation scheduling; lemon; plant-water relations; sap flow; trunk diameter fluctuations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The feasibility of obtaining sap flow (SF), maximum daily trunk shrinkage (MDS) and midday stem water potential (Psi(stem)) baselines or reference values for use in irrigation scheduling was studied in adult Fino lemon trees (Citrus limon (L.) Burm. fil.) grafted on sour orange (C. aurantium L.) rootstocks. Plants were irrigated daily above their water requirements in order to obtain non-limiting soil water conditions. The results indicated that baselines for plant-based water status indicators (MDS, SF and Psi(stem)) can be obtained, even though there was a certain scattering of the data points representing the relations between the plant-based measurements and the environmental variables (reference evapotranspiration, solar radiation, vapour pressure deficit and temperature). SF was more closely associated with changes in the studied evaporative demand variables than were MDS and Psi(stem). SF and Psi(stem) were more closely correlated with changes in reference evapotranspiration (ETo) (r(2) = 0.93 and 0.79, respectively), while MDS behaviour was best correlated with mean daily air temperature (T-m) (r(2) = 0.76). Increases in the evaporative demand induced more negative Psi(stem) values and, as a consequence, SF increased, which, in turn, was translated into an increase in MDS. This confirmed that SF and MDS were very good predictors of the plant water status during the observation period and their continuous recording offers the promising possibility of their use in automatic irrigation scheduling in lemon trees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available