4.5 Article

Latitudinal variation of Saturn photochemistry deduced from spatially-resolved ultraviolet spectra

Journal

ICARUS
Volume 180, Issue 2, Pages 379-392

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2005.11.005

Keywords

atmospheres, composition; photochemistry; Saturn, atmosphere; ultraviolet observations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We obtained spatially-resolved ultraviolet spectra of Saturn in 1994 with the Faint Object Spectrometer and Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph of the Hubble Space Telescope. We observed four areas on the planet at 15 degrees N. 33 degrees S. 41 degrees S, and 52 degrees S, with a field-of-view of less than 2 x 2 arcsec(2), compared to the 16-arcsec planet diameter. The wavelength range, 1550-2300 angstrom, encompasses absorption from major hydro-carbons (C2H6, C2H4, C2H2, CH3C2H, C4H2) and water. We find global hydrocarbon abundances and a C2H2 vertical distribution compatible with infrared observations, in contrast with previous analyses of ultraviolet spectra. The stratospheric haze opacity decreases from polar region to the equator. Saturn mid-latitudes are photochemically distinct from the rest of the planet. At 33 degrees S. the spectrum requires either (1) a distinctly different C2H2 vertical distribution or (2) a locally enhanced water abundance. At 41 degrees S, the hydrocarbon abundance exhibits a local minimum, within a global trend of increasing abundance from equator to pole. This global trend may result from an increased abundance of short-lived hydrocarbons such as C4H2. Photochemical models predict a depletion of hydrocarbon molecules in the presence of stratospheric water [Moses et al., 2000. Icarus 143, 166-202]. These results are consistent with a localized influx of water. in the form of high charge to mass ratio particles, flowing into Saturn's atmosphere at latitudes magnetically linked to the rings. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available